[squeak-dev] Choice of image for OMeta?
Michael Haupt
mhaupt at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 05:58:04 UTC 2010
Casey,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Casey Ransberger
<casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the choice of 3.8, or 3.9, do folks have a general suggestion? I've
> heard there were some "sweet" images over the years. I'm of course going to
> be unable to resist loading OMeta into a trunk image; I have low
> expectations for success with that, but I'm kind of interested in seeing
> what the difference is in the performance of the Javascript implementation
> when Cog is at the bottom of the stack.
we're using OMeta2 (IIRC) in several projects in bleeding-edge
up-to-date trunk images (some atop Cog) around here. I don't recall
whether any particular fixes were required, but if that is the case,
we can surely help.
Best,
Michael
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|