On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Hannes Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> If I am not mistaken this has made it into the trunk by now. Is this
> correct? Retest needed then.

No, this isn't in trunk yet.  Yes, it needs testing.

> There is an issue about naming the global variable which keeps
> references to packages which are not supposed to be updated by the
> trunk update mechanism (Bert Freudenberg, I second it).

The Class Variable (not globlal) has been renamed to be, well, more
obvious about what it's intent is.

-Chris