On 05.12.2010, at 16:59, Tim Felgentreff wrote:

> Not maintaining it in the Trunk image is probably the right thing to do, but it should be included in the 4.2 release image.

+1

- Bert -

-- Sent from my Zuse Z3

> -- Gesendet von meinem Palm Pre
> 
> David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> schrieb am 05.12.2010 16:50: 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:52:08PM -0800, Casey Ransberger wrote: 
> > O-Completion: +1 
> > 
> > Yes oh yes please include O-Completion in 4.2. When we figure out what we're 
> > doing about easy loading of "Community Supported Packages" we can think 
> > about pulling it back out and making it an easily loadable package. 
> 
> IIUC, the O-Completion package is very actively maintained on SqueakSource 
> and is already loadable in Squeak trunk. Making a fork of this in Squeak 
> sounds to me like a Really Bad Idea. 
> 
> What would be a good idea is to *document* how to load O-Completion 
> (probably in one of the welcome workspaces that appears when the image 
> is first opened), so that a first time user can open Squeak 4.2 and 
> easily see how to load this package. I just tried loading it myself, 
> and it loads cleanly and works as advertised. What's not to like? :) 
> 
> Dave 
> 
> > 
> > This is something that I can show developers who are new to Smalltalk that 
> > they'll recognize and appreciate. I think it's a really big win. 
> > 
> > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > > It's December, and time to consider freezing the 4.2 code base. If we 
> > > can push any final enhancements and image documentation desired for 
> > > 4.2 in over the next week, we can freeze officially on the 11th. Is 
> > > this ok? 
> 
> Yes this sounds good to me. 
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > We should begin considering the release-notes. What is the easiest 
> > > way to identify everything that's one into 4.2 since 4.1? 
> > > 
> > > Some of the items listed at the 4.2-release page 
> > > (http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6160) are: 
> > > 
> > > - Integration of Cryptography 
> > > - Documentation 
> > > - Integration of O-Completion 
> > > 
> > > What do we all think about integration of O-Completion? Levente 
> > > already did the work, it makes the IDE that much more useful and 
> > > modern and, it can be turned off. Shall we include that? 
> > > 
> > > What What else do we need to consider for the 4.2 image release? 
> > > 
> 
> 
>