On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:17:14AM -0800, Andreas Raab wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 9:07 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> > True. We could also have a class var indicating whether to use signaling
> > vs. non-signaling NaNs. Virtually no code will care and but if it does
> > you can flip the switch for compatibility.
> 
> I've posted a version of this into the inbox for people to look at. I 
> think it's actually a quite reasonable tradeoff; let me know what you think.

I noticed you deleted the infinity check for cos but not for
sin. 

-- 
Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)