On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:

> On 2010/12/31 13:59, Enrico Spinielli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I still have the following applied in my image and I see it is still
>> not yet in Trunk.
>> Any core developer willing to commit it?
>
> It's not in the Inbox anymore and you're right, it wasn't applied. I have a 
> local copy I can put back in the Inbox, if it's convenient? Or if preferred I 
> can remake the submission based on Network's latest version.

I moved it to the treated inbox, because another solution was applied. 
SchemeRegistry has HttpUrl at nil, so Url urlClassForScheme: nil should 
return HttpUrl.


Levente

>
> frank
>
>> 
>> Hope it helps
>> Bye
>> Enrico
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 08:31, Frank Shearar
>> <frank.shearar at angband.za.org>  wrote:
>>> On 2010/09/08 08:04, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/7/2010 11:01 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> There's a quicker test: Do It with: Url absoluteFromText: 'foo'
>>>>> 
>>>>> Up until my submission (which is causing this trouble), "no scheme"
>>>>> meant "use an HttpUrl".
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can see two ways forward: (a) fix the calling sites like C. A.
>>>>> Oliver's submission, or (b) add "at: nil put: HttpUrl" in the
>>>>> SchemeRegistry.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I prefer (a) myself: 'foo' isn't any kind of valid _absolute_ URI.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Inbox contains Network-fbs.90, which contains (b)'s fix.
>>>> 
>>>> Perhaps even easier:
>>>> 
>>>> ^SchemeRegistry at: (scheme ifNil:['http']) ifAbsent:[GenericUrl]
>>> 
>>> I prefer this to my submission: it doesn't pollute SchemeRegistry.
>>> 
>>> Network-fbs.91 contains it.
>>> 
>>> frank
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>