[squeak-dev] Re: Monticello maintainer
siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 06:54:29 UTC 2010
Thank you Colin! Very much!
On 3 February 2010 08:12, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> On 02.02.2010, at 20:19, Colin Putney wrote:
>>> On 2010-02-01, at 11:56 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>> Andreas, i read about your concerns about MC and i feel like MC
>>>> currently is abandonware,
>>>> since its not maintained by anyone, yet it is de-facto standard tool
>>>> for sharing the code in squeak universe.
>>>> This situation is really bad and we need to change it.
>>> Ok, I volunteer.
>>> Igor's right - it's obvious that MC needs an active maintainer. I've been
>>> reluctant to step into this role because I'd rather devote my Squeaking time
>>> to MC2. So this will delay the release of MC 2.1, but may make the migration
>>> path smoother. I'll post more once I've had a chance to look at the state of
>>> the art and figure out a road map.
>> I don't really have time to work on it, but having written my share of MC
>> code, if you want to discuss anything you're welcome :) I actually found MC
>> quite understandable, even without many comments ...
> That's because you're smarter than me :-) But I'll use that opportunity to
> learn more about MC and help writing meaningful comments.
> - Andreas
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev