On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 11:43 -0700, Ken G. Brown wrote:
> At 7:09 AM -0800 2/16/10, Simon Michael apparently wrote:
> >Recently an op got irritated enough with keithy to ban him from the
> #squeak IRC channel, without much warning or community discussion.
> Unfortunately I believe such a unilateral ban creates "bad karma" that
> damages #squeak and Squeak in non-obvious ways.
> >
> >There are less harmful alternatives (eg: a more deliberate ban;
> training ourselves not to feed rants; or just accepting that #squeak
> may become unusable for an hour or two now and then). So, I feel this
> particular ban should end or at least be ratified by discussion/vote
> here on the list.
> 
> I agree with you, and feel the ban was totally unjustified and
> unwarranted. This banner in my opinion should immediately have his
> banning capabilities removed, he obviously cannot be trusted with the
> powers.
> 
> Ken G. Brown

Maybe, maybe not (unjustified).  I have now lifted the ban.  I suggest
anyone interested in this make their own judgment:

http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/squeak/10.02.14

Ken

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100216/58d762b5/attachment.pgp