[squeak-dev] Squeak Boxes ( was Re: Board 2010 who and ... )
ken at kencausey.com
Fri Feb 19 00:15:36 UTC 2010
You emailed me about this over a week ago (2 weeks?) and I have failed
to get back to you. I apologize and will make it a point to do that in
the next couple of days.
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 03:45 -0500, Chris Cunnington wrote:
> Bert said: "Ken, if you would not have to do any more box admin work,
> would you consider running again?"
> It sounds to me as though Ken is indispensable as a board member, and
> other people could do some of the admin work. I have the interest and
> the time to learn about this stuff. I've been reading the Box archives
> and the biggest problems I can see for me to participate in helping to
> run the box is that I'd need to get up to speed on Debian, as I use
> CentOS. Also I haven't set up Mailman before. Or used rsync, which is
> mentioned a lot.
> If somebody were willing to commit to answering my questions as I
> learn about it all, then I can provide a lot of support for the
> managing of box2.squeakfoundation.org.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100218/a16cc9e2/attachment.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev