[squeak-dev] Re: MessageTally fixes
leves at elte.hu
Sun Feb 21 15:06:53 UTC 2010
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Juan Vuletich wrote:
> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>>> Juan Vuletich wrote:
>>> Ok. It seems the class variable is needed for the debugger. Letting the
>>> debugger terminate the Timer greately enhances UI responsiveness when
>>> doing Alt-. during a tally. So I left it there. What is not needed anymore
>>> AFAIK is the #close method, as #ensure: ensures terminating it in the
>>> normal (non-debugger) case. The attach also includes raising an error in
>>> case of nested a tally being started. I did it in Cuis, and will be in the
>>> next Cuis release. Levente, feel free to test and publish for Squeak, or
>>> to take ideas from it.
>> Thanks, this looks good. The only thing I don't understand is that why
>> CodeHolder is better than StringHolder to view the report of MessageTally?
>> I found no use of the buttons. Is there anything different about CodeHolder
>> and StringHolder in Cuis?
> In Cuis, a StringHolder uses a TextEditor and a CodeHolder uses a
> SmalltalkEditor. So, a CodeHolder adds handy Smalltalk shortcuts like alt-m.
Thanks for the explanation.
> BTW, if you take a close look at Cuis, I'm sure you'd be porting tons of
> stuff back to Squeak.
That's probably true and I guess other people would do the same. A few
pointers would be helpful.
> Juan Vuletich
>>> Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev