[squeak-dev] Installer vs. CodeLoader (was: The Trunk: Collections-edc.314.mcz)

Edgar J. De Cleene edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar
Thu Feb 25 18:08:21 UTC 2010

On 2/25/10 2:48 PM, "Ralph Johnson" <johnson at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:

> These are excellent definitions.  Someone should put them on a web page so we
> can just cite them instead of repeating them.
> Note that kernel < core < build < basic < developer < max  while basic < web <
> max and I suppose basic < fun < max
> Note also that max might not load.  Also, we might eventually decide that if
> we have one, we don't need another.  For example, perhaps if we have core and
> some good scripts for building images, we don't need build.  But I bet that
> for each image, there will be somebody who will want it.
> it seems to me like 4.0 is more like basic.  Is that true?  What will 4.1 be
> like?

I wish be Sl3, with corrected code and new name.
See http://n4.nabble.com/ANN-SL3-11-9375-alpha-zip-td1555132.html

I delay this until we finish the current trunk phase.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100225/a4ee1a9b/attachment.htm

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list