[squeak-dev] Re: [Squeak 4.0] A Couple of Methods (PLEASE REVIEW)
juan at jvuletich.org
Sat Feb 27 00:58:48 UTC 2010
Yes. We already have Smalltalk copyright. It mentions Xerox and Apple.
And we also have Utilities copyrightNotice that only mentions Apple.
They it doesn't agree with the posted license that only mentions The
Squeak Community. What would be the proper copyright notice and why?
Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Don't forget about copyright as well :)
> On 27 February 2010 01:26, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 2/27/2010 12:21 AM, keith wrote:
>>>> I agree with the overload aspect but [Smalltalk license] is just to
>>>> good not to use it.
>>> But its not really Smalltalk's licence it is "this system's licence" how
>> My point is it's idiomatic (the Python folks call it "pythonic"). Just
>> Smalltalk license.
>> SmalltalkImage current license.
>> SystemVersion current license.
>> Which one would you guess at?
>>> SqueaksLicence yo just print like
>> Totally :-)
>> - Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev