[squeak-dev] Re: Package unload status
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Jan 6 02:15:07 UTC 2010
Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> Good to know. It's funny that every fork has MIT license, but not squeak.
Well, we do. The problem we're facing is that we need the SFC lawyers to
agree that we've *proven* that we're fully MIT relicensed. And we just
don't want to announce the (MIT relicensed) 4.0 without also announcing
our joining the SFC which is what creates the delay.
BTW, the process is moving along. Slowly, but definitely moving.
More information about the Squeak-dev