[squeak-dev] Re: Package unload status
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Sat Jan 9 12:27:48 UTC 2010
Andreas Raab wrote:
> Juan Vuletich wrote:
>> Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> Juan Vuletich wrote:
>>>> BTW, in Cuis, Morph will eventually have a lot less than 500
>>>> methods. I hope to get to about 200.
>>>
>>> Very nice. It's extremely valuable to have someone with a real
>>> interest in making things smaller. Coincidentally, I'm quite okay
>>> with the idea that Cuis will always have a smaller image than a core
>>> Squeak image would be. I think the important part is to have
>>> reasonable compatibility betweeen the two. I want compatible kernel
>>> interfaces, compatible collection libraries, compatible morph
>>> protocols. In other words, anything built for Cuis should run on top
>>> of Squeak without changes.
>>
>> Interesting. So far I have only thought about how Cuis could support
>> stuff meant for Squeak!
>
> Sure, it does go both ways - but what I meant to say is that Squeak =
> Cuis + X so naturally everything that works in Cuis will work in
> Squeak but only stuff in Squeak that doesn't use X will be able to run
> in Cuis. Where X might be something like MC + M17N + MorphicPlus or
> something like that.
>
>> WRT compatibility of apps with Squeak, I believe Cuis packages will
>> fall in 3 categories:
>>
>> 1) Stuff that is identical (almost) to Squeak. For example, I took
>> the current Compiler categories and Kernel-Methods to support
>> closures. Kernel-Classes, Kernel-Objects, Kernel-Numbers and all
>> Collections- categories could follow. These are parts of the system
>> that are in good shape in Squeak, and have people doing great work
>> there too. Stuff I can't really improve.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> 2) Stuff that I have somewhat modified. I removed lots of protocol.
>> This obviously doesn't affect porting Cuis apps to Squeak. But I also
>> removed arguments, making some messages shorter, and added some
>> convenience methods. This is easy to address by adding an optional
>> 'Cuis compatibility' package for Squeak.
>
> Let's not. Let's make sure Squeak support these protocols natively and
> build the next layer on top of it. In fact, that might be something
> you could start helping with today. Remember, if we end up with Squeak
> = Cuis + X then we can have our cake and eat it too - a nice, small
> microkernel and more stuff built on top of it.
>
> (if you feel more comfortable adding this as a Cuis extension, feel
> free to do so, but I don't think it's necessary)
This is easy to do in any way. I'd be changing a lot in Morphic during
the next months for Morphic 3, so I'd do that later, when protocols in
Cuis start to stabilize.
>> 3) Stuff that is really different. For example TextStyle, and the new
>> TextEditor application. (I'm not talking about the Editor hierarchy
>> here. In Cuis do World/Open/Text Editor. I also have a fairly
>> complete, not yet released, style based text editor.) These might
>> need being ported to Squeak and will give some work. I could also
>> include Morphic here. But I also hope to replace the current Morphic
>> in Cuis with Morphic 3. And I also hope to be able to make Morphic 3
>> an optional package for Squeak and Pharo.
>
> The one thing I'd recommend is not "reusing" existing namespaces. If
> you have a new UI framework, don't call it "Morph" or "Morphic". This
> only leads to confusion down the road since it can't be loaded
> side-by-side with Morphic. Anything you do in a separate namespace
> won't be a problem - we've already agreed how to deal with the
> underlying basics so basically this is just another application on top
> of Cuis which can be run on top of Squeak :-)
Mhhh! I think the name "Morphic 3" makes sense, as it all started after
suggestions from John Maloney (in SqueakNews) and Dan Ingalls (in "Where
is Squeak headed"). But I agree with your reasons too. So far, the name
of the framework is "Morphic 3" and the root class is M3Morph (which I
don't really like). Maybe I'd come up with a completely unrelated name.
Perhaps "CuisGraphics" or something... Suggestions welcome!
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|