[squeak-dev] Re: [BUG][FIX][FIX],
was: (Re: Re: Flaw in SocketStream>>peek detected)
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Jan 15 01:43:16 UTC 2010
Andreas Raab wrote:
> Andreas Raab wrote:
>> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>> " the above should endup with timeout exception ,
>>> but following one should hang indefinitely"
>> Absolutely not. Read the comment on shouldSignal:
>> "If shouldSignal is enabled the Socket Exceptions
>> ConnectionClosed and ConnectionTimedOut"
> And I guess I should read more carefully, too :-) In any case, timeouts
> *are* handled via #timeout: and that makes good sense.
(last response to my own post :-)
And of course, the easy to do what you're trying to do is to change:
^timeout > 0 and:[shouldSignal]
This would suppress all timeouts unless shouldSignal is true. BTW, I've
never seen a case where I've been using a non-signaling socket stream.
Does that case even exist?
More information about the Squeak-dev