On 24 Jan 2010, at 18:55, Igor Stasenko wrote:

> 2010/1/24 keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>>
>>>> May I point out again that it doesn't work for me. My patches to  
>>>> trunk
>>>> would
>>>> be fixes for Monticello. These fixes would break trunk, therefore  
>>>> it
>>>> doesn't
>>>> work as you suppose.
>>>
>>> Strange, then , why calling it fix - fixes usually not breaking  
>>> existing
>>> stuff.
>>> Call it replacement or rewrite, or upgrade, but not 'fix'.
>>
>> I think AGAIN you are missing the point completely
>>
>> Monticello cant load itself for anything other than the most minor of
>> changes.
>>
>
> See my other reply. MC can load code, which can do anything with MC.

I look forward to seeing trunk with MC1.5 then, cool

Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100124/61ac1942/attachment.htm