2010/1/24 keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>
> On 24 Jan 2010, at 18:55, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
> 2010/1/24 keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>
> May I point out again that it doesn't work for me. My patches to trunk
>
> would
>
> be fixes for Monticello. These fixes would break trunk, therefore it
>
> doesn't
>
> work as you suppose.
>
> Strange, then , why calling it fix - fixes usually not breaking existing
>
> stuff.
>
> Call it replacement or rewrite, or upgrade, but not 'fix'.
>
> I think AGAIN you are missing the point completely
>
> Monticello cant load itself for anything other than the most minor of
>
> changes.
>
>
> See my other reply. MC can load code, which can do anything with MC.
>
> I look forward to seeing trunk with MC1.5 then, cool

if you remember, i already raised this topic here and in Pharo list.
The problem is, that (as you pointing in another thread about
capturing knowledge), there's no one left,
having such knowledge about MC 1.5., to do such integration.



> Keith
>

-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.