David,

I'd love to see your SSLSocketStream if you feel comfortable and able in 
sharing it.

Cheers,
Rob

--------------------------------------------------
From: "C. David Shaffer" <cdshaffer at acm.org>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 1:41 PM
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" 
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev]	stream>>#nextPutAll:changed	toreturncollectioninsteadofthestream?

> On 06/28/10 04:20, Rob Withers wrote:
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "C. David Shaffer" <cdshaffer at acm.org>
>> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 1:23 AM
>> To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
>> <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev]    stream>>#nextPutAll:changed
>> toreturncollectioninsteadofthe stream?
>>
>>>
>>>> That's awesome to hear!  What are you doing with it?  Squeak to squeak
>>>> or squeak to the world?  What kind of application?  Please tell me
>>>> about it!
>>>
>>> We talk to Google Docs via the various APIs (DocumentsList, Spreadsheets
>>> and a couple others) over https.  I believe that my AmazonAWS code also
>>> uses https.  For a while we were also talking to an IBM Jazz server over
>>> SSL but that project was put on the back burner.  I have a custom
>>
>> OH!  It seems your response got cutoff...   Sounds exciting, what you
>> have written.  Which image?  Croquet, Pharo?
>>
> Oops, I think I meant to mention a "SSLSocketStream" wrapper but I
> forgot to finish the e-mail.  Basically I wrap the HTTP or HTTPS socket
> in a stream which is either a SocketStream or an SSLSocketStream.  That
> way I don't need to worry about what kind of socket I'm interacting
> with.  Or, maybe I was going to mention that I have my own HTTP/S client
> library as well.  I'd like to see both of these make their way into the
> community if my employer is willing.
>
> For this work I've been using Squeak (3.9 most recently but now I'm
> moving to 4.1).
>
> David
>