[squeak-dev] SmalltalkImage current vs. Smalltalk
siguctua at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 16:55:10 UTC 2010
If you remember previous discussion about this, i proposed to use
Smalltalk, which having a 'globals' ivar , which is a SystemDictionary
so, that Smalltalk>>at: x
globals at: x
then Smalltalk global is an instance of SmalltalkImage , equal to
And SystemDictionary is just a dictionary without any extra utility methods.
On 2 March 2010 18:32, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Smalltalk is a SystemDictionary, which is-a Dictionary. This suggests
> Smalltalk's main responsibility is mapping the list of global names to
> their global objects, and providing access to them by direct
> I don't understand why would want to commingle a bunch of utility
> methods in with this primary (global name mapping) responsibility..?
> What is the problem exactly?
> Also, I'm curious about Cuis compatibility; is this really realistic
> or important? Why is it important? This would seem to be a
> relatively superficial difference with Cuis and other Smalltalk's, so
> I hope we will base decisions on what we think is the "right thing" to
> do rather than compatibility with something else that might not
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Folks -
>> I was just trying to load some other code and once too many I got bitten by
>> this silly SmalltalkImage current vs. Smalltalk stuff, so I'll fix it now.
>> The only question is which way. There are two alternatives which achieve the
>> goal of "SmalltalkImage current == Smalltalk":
>> 1) The Cuis variant: Move all the code back to SystemDictionary; implement
>> SmalltalkImage current as ^Smalltalk.
>> Pro: Compatible with Cuis.
>> Con: Lack of separation of concerns.
>> 2) The inverse Cuis variant: Move all the code from SystemDictionary to
>> SmalltalkImage; add a 'globals' variable (populated by an instance of
>> SystemDictionary) and convert everything roughly like this:
>> SmalltalkImage current globals: Smalltalk.
>> Smalltalk := SmalltalkImage current.
>> Pro: Better separation of concerns.
>> Con: Different from Cuis.
>> I really don't care which way we do it; all I want is to get out of the mess
>> we've created by introducing "SmalltalkImage current".
>> If you have an opinion, voice it, otherwise I'll just pick one.
>> - Andreas
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev