[squeak-dev] Re: Object>>#is:? (was: Re: PackageDependencyTest)

Juan Vuletich juan at jvuletich.org
Thu Mar 4 20:45:03 UTC 2010

Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>> ...
> If #is: implementation has to reflect a class hierarchy, then I don't 
> see how it can be any better than #isKindOf: and #isMemberOf: 

In my opinion, it does not have to reflect a class hierarchy at all, but 
conformance to some protocol. Take a look at 
http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/Drafts/2009/essay.pdf .

Juan Vuletich

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list