[squeak-dev] Re: Object>>#is:? (was: Re: PackageDependencyTest)

Michael Haupt mhaupt at gmail.com
Thu Mar 4 21:32:51 UTC 2010


2010/3/4 Stéphane Rollandin <lecteur at zogotounga.net>:
> well we have to know if #is: is about testing inheritance, or more generally
> protocols. if it's for testing inheritance, all right my problem is not
> pertinent and I have no issues with #is: (only that it's maybe a little too
> much to call this #is:, then; it could be called #isSortOf: :)

#isA:? (OK, this makes complete sense for inheritance only.)



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list