On 07. 03. 2010 11:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 10:59 AM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>> This is actually very good idea and because we need to reimplement the
>> Swazoo HTTP messaging part due to licensing reasons anyway, even more
>> timely.
> 
> Don't get me started on this...  Are you sure there's no more pressing
> need for Swazoo?

Certainly, like improving the HTTP Server part according to your
suggestions and actual code. Also unifiying the portability layer (Sport
and Grease) under a common umbrella is a good idea, then we can move
Swazoo on that layer.

But Julian's idea came just at the right moment and it has a broader
appeal. We can then redesign the HTTP server part in the meantime. I see
many synergies there.

Best regards
Janko