On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Julian Fitzell <jfitzell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org> wrote:
>> On 03/07/2010 11:17 AM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >  Don't get me started on this...  Are you sure there's no more pressing
>>>> >  need for Swazoo?
>>>
>>> Certainly, like improving the HTTP Server part according to your
>>> suggestions and actual code. Also unifiying the portability layer (Sport
>>> and Grease) under a common umbrella is a good idea, then we can move
>>> Swazoo on that layer.
>>>
>>> But Julian's idea came just at the right moment and it has a broader
>>> appeal. We can then redesign the HTTP server part in the meantime. I see
>>> many synergies there.
>>
>> Ok, then I agree. :-)  But let's set the priorities straight. :-)
>
> I'm not suggesting it is the most urgent item, merely that it is
> beneficial, well defined (or at least well-scoped :) ), and
> potentially interesting for a student.

Gah... have to hit reply-all for cross-posted mailing lists posts... sigh.

Julian