Fortunately, Glorp doesn't have all that many distinct contributors, and I do have a reasonable number of signatures already. I've been thinking about changing the license for a while, but it's a lot of work, and not much fun. Any advice from those involved with doing this for Squeak  appreciated.

At 01:06 PM 2010-03-08, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Bergmann <astares at gmx.de> writes:
>
>Torsten> maybe we can ask Alan Knight if it would be possible to dual-license
>Torsten> GLORP, he gets a CC: of this mail. The project is currently LGPL [1]
>Torsten> which may cause problems (according to the discussion on squeak-dev,
>Torsten> see [2] and [3]).
>
>Torsten> GLORP was initially a CampSmalltalk project and later continued at
>Torsten> Cincom.
>
>Ugh.  Unfortuately, adding a license like that means getting signatures from
>*all* contributors, unless they have all explicitly signed rights over to
>Alan.
>
>This is why it's important to get the license *right* to begin with, folks.
>
>-- 
>Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
><merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion

--
Alan Knight [|], Engineering Manager, Cincom Smalltalk
knight at acm.org
aknight at cincom.com
http://www.cincom.com/smalltalk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100308/7b40d5d8/attachment.htm