[squeak-dev] Please, what is the status of Smalltalk and SmalltalkImage?

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 00:24:20 UTC 2010

On 10 March 2010 02:20, Matthew Fulmer <tapplek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi. I haven't been paying too much attention to the above
> refactoring (I'll read the mails now), but what is up with that
> change? I'm trying to port a very large application (Cobalt) to
> the trunk. I replaced all occurrences of Smalltalk with
> SmalltalkImage current in all places where vm parameters were
> needed, last week, and now Smalltalk at: stopped working.
> What do I need to do for Cobalt? I don't want to waste much time
> on this; I have more important things to worry about.

There should be no problems, currently, because all changes so far is
100% backwards compatible
with SmalltalkImage current.

Please, toss in the details about the problem you encountered and i
expect it will be fixed in a couple hours :)

> --
> Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)

Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list