[squeak-dev] Re: Please, what is the status of Smalltalk and
SmalltalkImage?
Matthew Fulmer
tapplek at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 01:08:10 UTC 2010
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Andreas Raab wrote:
> On 3/9/2010 4:20 PM, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> > Hi. I haven't been paying too much attention to the above
> > refactoring (I'll read the mails now), but what is up with that
> > change? I'm trying to port a very large application (Cobalt) to
> > the trunk. I replaced all occurrences of Smalltalk with
> > SmalltalkImage current in all places where vm parameters were
> > needed, last week, and now Smalltalk at: stopped working.
>
> Sorry for that. I noticed it myself yesterday but was too tired to fix
> it. I've just posted an update that adds #at:ifAbsentPut: as part of the
> at:[put:|ifAbsent:|ifPresent:] family of methods on SmalltalkImage.
Should System-ar.285 be merged with System-laza.289?
> Also, make sure you update from the TweakCore repository; I've posted a
> fix for CParser that has much larger potential of causing some headaches
> because it effectively turns off CParser completely (change from using
> #method:context:encoder to #method:context:).
I already fixed that in Tweak-Compiler-mtf.47. did I do it
wrong?
--
Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|