If I understand correctly Squeak 4 is Squeak 3.10.2 but with the MIT license tag on it even though it has hundreds of methods from authors that have not signed the agreement. Is this OK from a legal point of view? Just curious...

Cheers,
Adrian

BTW, in Pharo we rewrote or removed all dirty code. This is documented here in case you are interested: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort and http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing


On Mar 10, 2010, at 08:12 , Ronald Spengler wrote:

> Ah, okay. Got the SystemVersion thing fished out.
> 
> SystemVersion setVersion
> 
> (I hope, ahaha)
> 
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Ronald Spengler <ron.spengler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Regarding SystemVersion: What exactly needs to be done here? I wasn't
>> aware of this requirement.
>> 
>> ChangeSets: Do I just need to open a change sorter and destroy all the
>> change sets?
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0alpha/rc1/
>>> 
>>> Yay, getting there :)
>>> 
>>> Notes:
>>> 
>>> * SystemVersion should be 'Squeak4.0', it is still 3.10.2
>>> 
>>> * ChangeSets need to be removed
>>> 
>>> * I'd put a CR after the license in the sources file. You need to rewrite it anyway to have 4.0 appear in it, not 3.10.2
>>> 
>>> * the Mac version should include a newer VM (but that's no blocker)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Bert -
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Ron
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Casey Ransberger
>