[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Traits-ar.283.mcz
rebmekop at gmail.com
Fri Mar 12 13:43:05 UTC 2010
I just wanted to ask:
Should we store the actual items that have changed or some sort of
description like MCDefinition or DSChange?.
> This should be fixed by passing a description of some sort (similar to MCClassDefinition) or specifically the values that were changed.
The next question is: could we reuse one of these?
I think, actually DSChange  models exactly what we want.
So what about announcing DSChange (and DSDoIt) objects,
and providing a compatibility protocol with AbstractEvent.
If this would work out, it would simplify SystemChangeAnnouncer
implementation greatly, and pave the way for DeltaStream adoption.
What do you think?
 You can take a look what DSChanges are by evaluating:
More information about the Squeak-dev