On the state of Squeak bug reporting (was: Re: [squeak-dev] "find method" changes)

Michael Davies mykdavies+squeak at gmail.com
Fri Mar 12 21:11:37 UTC 2010

On 12 March 2010 21:20, Michael Davies
<mykdavies+squeak at gmail.com<mykdavies%2Bsqueak at gmail.com>
> wrote:

> I also noticed that this appears to have been the first activity on
> bugs.squeak.org this year. So a question for squeak-dev readers: What is
> the role of bugs.squeak.org in the development process, in particular is
> the following text from the website still an accurate statement?
> "We currently use Mantis <http://bugs.impara.de/> for issue tracking, both
> for Squeak itself and other Squeak projects."

Ken has pointed out to me that I was only looking at the "Squeak Packages"
project rather than "Squeak", hence the apparent lack of activity. "Squeak"
itself is teeming with activity.

Apologies for this misunderstanding,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100312/6de0ff8e/attachment.htm

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list