[squeak-dev] [Election] ...is soon upon us! Last day info
keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Mar 13 15:45:59 UTC 2010
>>> Come on now, the majority of what you write is to insist that your
>>> way will be better.
>> Not at all, I have two main points... 1) the board has no
>> constitution, and 2) trunk is the worst possible process you could
>> have chosen, because
>> a) it isn't a process it is an excuse to group-hack a monolithic
>> b) the philosophy behind trunk is the opposite of where we want to
>> go, monolithic vs support all forks with a kernel you can build on.
>> c) moving targets are the worst possible scenario.
>> d) it uses tools that are too high level.
>> e) it is release a year rather then release a month
>> f) it relies on an elite to manage it
>> g) it closes out people who cant change things without breaking it.
> Ha ha. We really aren't on the same wavelength, are we? You state
> that "trunk is the worst possible process" because it has negative
> characteristics a,b,c,d,e,f,g. It goes without saying that you
> believe that your process does not share these characteristics.
> Simple logic dictates that if trunk is the worst then yours is
> better, and if therefore you insist that trunk is the worst, then
> you are also insisting that yours is better.
I am saying that anything else would be better, since my process
qualifies as being anything, I guess you are right.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev