Ok, tomorrow I'll look at pushing a 4.2.3 Vm that contains the lurking bitblt fixes. 
However someone needs to confirm then they exist in all the VM that become the basis for 4.0


On 2010-03-13, at 7:15 PM, Casey Ransberger wrote:

> As I understand it, parts of the image are indeed under different
> copyrights. As hard as it is to grok, copyright and license, it would
> seem, are separate issues. I Am Not A Lawyer. If the SFC lawyers come
> back asking us to revise this part, I'll do it.
> 
> I used the Mac VM that John recommended. Not sure about the BitBlt
> tests. Isn't that a known issue? I thought I saw a thread about that.
> Seems like something that should be fixable after 4.0. 4.0 roughly
> equals 3.10.2...

--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================