On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, John M McIntosh wrote:

> Ok, tomorrow I'll look at pushing a 4.2.3 Vm that contains the lurking bitblt fixes.
> However someone needs to confirm then they exist in all the VM that become the basis for 4.0

The windows vm has them, the unix vm doesn't, but we need a new unix vm 
anyway, because the last release isn't gnuified.


Levente

>
>
> On 2010-03-13, at 7:15 PM, Casey Ransberger wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, parts of the image are indeed under different
>> copyrights. As hard as it is to grok, copyright and license, it would
>> seem, are separate issues. I Am Not A Lawyer. If the SFC lawyers come
>> back asking us to revise this part, I'll do it.
>>
>> I used the Mac VM that John recommended. Not sure about the BitBlt
>> tests. Isn't that a known issue? I thought I saw a thread about that.
>> Seems like something that should be fixable after 4.0. 4.0 roughly
>> equals 3.10.2...
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> ===========================================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>