[squeak-dev] 4.0 Announcement?

Ken G. Brown kbrown at mac.com
Tue Mar 16 19:57:28 UTC 2010


At 11:53 AM -0700 3/16/10, Randal L. Schwartz apparently wrote:
> >>>>> "Ken" == Ken G Brown <kbrown at mac.com> writes:
>
>Ken> Isn't all the fanfare a bit premature seeing as how it hasn't been
>Ken> accepted by SFC yet?
>
>It has.  We've followed everything the SFLC has required of us.
>
>This does not make us part of the SFC *yet*.  It merely makes us *eligible*.
>
>Ken> At least to my knowledge the deal hasn't been signed yet, or did I miss
>Ken> the discussion of the contract and the announcement?
>
>The discussion has been summarized here many times of the conversation
>between the SOB and the SFC.
>
>Ken> Who even is authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the SOB and the
>Ken> community?
>
>The SFC accepts that the duly-elected SOB can sign on behalf of the community.
>That's good enough for me.
>
>--
>Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
><merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion

Is the correspondence between the SOB and the SFLC available for looking at somewhere?

Who is able to sign on behalf of the board?

Do all board members have to sign unanimously?

Or does the SOB have a designated signing authority or several?

Ken G. Brown



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list