[squeak-dev] Re: [BUG] Browsers vertically squished in trunk?

Casey Ransberger casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Tue Mar 30 22:27:11 UTC 2010

Hmmm. Totally different behavior in this method if the preference
#reverseWindowStagger is enabled. What I don't understand is why the window
staggering policy should have anything to do with the default height or
width of windows.

I am officially calling shenanigans on this method.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Casey Ransberger
<casey.obrien.r at gmail.com>wrote:

> Found it.
> RealEstateAgent class>>standardWindowExtent
> <snip>
> ^ (allowedArea extent - (grid*(maxLevel+1*2) + (grid//2))) min:
> StandardSize "600 at 400"].
> Something is going wrong with the math here. Changing this line to (note
> that I've just commented everything out and returned 600 at 400) fixes the
> bug, but probably breaks tons of other stuff:
> ^"^ (allowedArea extent - (grid*(maxLevel+1*2) + (grid//2))) min:
> StandardSize "600 at 400].
> I'm going to see if I can figure out exactly what's going wrong with this,
> and if so, push a proper fix to the Inbox.
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Casey Ransberger <
> casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When I open a system browser in recent trunk images, the browser opens up
>> squished vertically so the first thing I need to do is resize it. I could
>> swear I'd seen this some place before, and the fix wound up being in
>> toolbuilder somewhere. IIRC Andreas pointed out the fix, but I can't find
>> the message anywhere in any of my inboxes.
>> As a sanity check, are other people seeing this too? I might note that
>> I've been using Squeak on a very small screen lately, if that makes any
>> difference (I don't know, maybe the browser tries to open at a % of total
>> screen real estate, which is too small on my box?)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100330/74604ade/attachment.htm

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list