[squeak-dev] Re: Proposal: Project Pink Book

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Sun May 2 21:15:09 UTC 2010


On 5/2/10, Ian Trudel <ian.trudel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/5/2 Casey Ransberger <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com>:
>> If you feel so strongly that we should have an integrated spell checker,
>> why
>> don't you implement or integrate one, and then push it to the Inbox? I
>> would
>> *love* to be able to spell check things in Squeak.
>
> Squeak is a complex system, more than some of us would admit.
YES.

....
>
> I am reading the comment from Bert and I believe there is a
> misunderstanding. When someone writes documentation for something he
> or she understands, he or she does not have any immediate need for
> this documentation.
But maybe for other documentation  :-)

> The reciprocity Bert mentioned is nonexistent.

The reciprocity _is_ existent.

I document class A which I understand and you document class B which I
do not understand....

Regards
Hannes



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list