That's quotable! I'm going to quote you in the other thread:)

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:07 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 03:22:56PM -0700, Casey Ransberger wrote:
> > Interesting. Is the class variable used at all? If not, we should
> probably
> > remove it.
>
> Right you are. I removed it.
>
> > David: thank you very much for your reply. As you have some experience
> with
> > these classes, and are willing to make it happen, I'm going to continue
> my
> > quest in other classes:)
> >
> > I am filled with joy right now.
>
> Thanks for putting some focus on this. It is actually a good little
> case study on the value of documenting the system. The moral of the
> story is that if you can't explain how something works in clear language,
> then there is a pretty good chance that you don't know how it works.
> And if you don't know how it works, then there is a pretty good chance
> that it doesn't ;-)
>
> Dave
>
>
>


-- 
Casey Ransberger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100502/7a7d781a/attachment.htm