[squeak-dev] comments on SFC agreement

John M McIntosh johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com
Tue May 4 23:18:02 UTC 2010


On 2010-05-04, at 3:54 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> ? 
> 
> It's intended to mean the same, yes. Where do you see a difference? 
> 
> - Bert -

One is called (“Free Software”) the other is called ("MIT License") 

One is explicit, the other can mean any variation of the class of  "Free Software" licenses? 
But if you ARE in fact restricting a license to use for contributions to Squeak as per  http://squeak.org/SqueakLicense/
then should you indicate that up front, or imply you are accepting any "Free Software" license? 

--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2445 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100504/f6c7de20/smime.bin


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list