[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Community Supported Packages
Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Mon May 17 13:33:33 UTC 2010
You may be right.
Now I suggest that we do and learn.
Stef
On May 17, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote on [1]:
>> I don't agree here. You DON'T necessary need to have the packages inside the
>> image to have a UI.
>
> Please read what I wrote. I did not say that it is impossible
> to build the UI when you have an external config - but "it would
> be easy to build a UI" when it is already in the image. I'm sure
> you will agree here.
>
> However - even when SqueakMap is not well maintained - it's UI
> was easy to use and was easy accessible and one could use it
> with a few clicks.
>
> Using Monticello tools, loading and evaluating by hand is
> currently possible - but this is a step backward in usability
> compared to what Squeak has/had. But this is a convenience/tool
> issue that has to be solved.
>
> Bye
> T.
>
> [1] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-May/026829.html
> --
> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|