Teleplacer wrote:
> 
> At this point adding configs does *not* necessarily imply we consider 
> all of them 'supported' packages. What I'm rather looking for is a body 
> of functioning configurations in Squeak that I can start applying some 
> integration tests to.
> 

Thanks for mentioning that!  I was holding back a few that probably wouldn't
be supported, but work just fine.

Sean 
-- 
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/More-configurations-tp2223995p2224714.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.