[squeak-dev] Community Supported Packages
Josh Gargus
josh at schwa.ca
Thu May 20 19:24:40 UTC 2010
On May 17, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
> But is .
>
> Again I beg going to SqueakCore .image as default....
>
Hi Edgar,
We had a long discussion about this in the "Edgar from the Ostracism" thread. I thought that the conclusion was that you were convinced by the argument that Andreas made, and that you were satisfied. Now it seems like we're right back where we started.
I still have the same problem with SqueakCore as I did before: I don't understand what's better about it than what we currently have. I glanced over the previous emails to refresh my memory, and although I asked for an explanation, I didn't find one. Please refresh my memory if I missed it. If I didn't miss it, then please explain the differences and benefits of SqueakCore.
Begging won't get you anywhere, especially if people don't understand your proposal. However, a rational argument might.
Cheers,
Josh
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100520/efd92229/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|