[squeak-dev] Community Supported Packages

Josh Gargus josh at schwa.ca
Thu May 20 19:24:40 UTC 2010


On May 17, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> 
> But is .
> 
> Again I beg going to SqueakCore .image as default....
> 


Hi Edgar, 

We had a long discussion about this in the "Edgar from the Ostracism" thread.  I thought that the conclusion was that you were convinced by the argument that Andreas made, and that you were satisfied.  Now it seems like we're right back where we started.

I still have the same problem with SqueakCore as I did before: I don't understand what's better about it than what we currently have.  I glanced over the previous emails to refresh my memory, and although I asked for an explanation, I didn't find one.  Please refresh my memory if I missed it.  If I didn't miss it, then please explain the differences and benefits of SqueakCore.  

Begging won't get you anywhere, especially if people don't understand your proposal.  However, a rational argument might.

Cheers,
Josh




> 
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100520/efd92229/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list