[squeak-dev] SocketStream not a Stream?
leves at elte.hu
Tue Nov 2 04:20:48 UTC 2010
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Hi -
> I (accidentally) noticed that SocketStream isn't a subclass of Stream. Is
> there any reason why this should remain true? It strikes me as odd as Stream
> has very few requirements (basically #next, #nextPut:, and #atEnd) which are
> trivially fulfilled by SocketStream. Anyone seeing a reason not to change
It should also implement #contents, but that's trivial to do.
> - Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev