[squeak-dev] Xtreams : first embryonary port on Squeak

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Mon Oct 11 14:45:19 UTC 2010


Thank you Julian for the clarification.

Yes, -- using a slight variation and having two projects in the same
repository is confusing.

And -- having Xtreams (is this the correct name?) for Squeak is exciting!

--Hannes

On 10/11/10, Julian Fitzell <jfitzell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting forking (I had another post in this thread talking
> about Grease).
>
> But even Seaside exists both in SqueakSource and in the Cincom Public
> Store. I was merely asking if the the appropriate project name
> couldn't be used in SqueakSource. Using a slight variation (and having
> two projects in the one repo) is just confusing.
>
> Julian
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Hannes Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I think it should go the way Seaside is handled. Something like
>> 'Grease' and 'Sport' *** on top of Squeak and the go to the original
>> code base. Not a fork of the code for the library.
>>
>> Maybe Grease and Sport are good enough to have compatibility?
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>>
>> Sport and Grease cover different areas with their portability APIs.
>> Sport covers Sockets, Files, Time, Exception handling and utilities
>> such as being able to explicitly test in which Smalltalk dialect code
>> is being run in. Grease covers utilities for parsing, printing,
>> encoding & decoding strings, delayed sends, common exceptions,
>> utilities such as secure hash. There is some overlap, but not much.
>> For example, Seaside expects the underlying HTTP server to deal with
>> socket issues so Grease does not deal with sockets. Sport in turn does
>> not have the extensive parsing and printing facilities found in
>> Grease.
>>
>> On 10/11/10, Julian Fitzell <jfitzell at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This still seems confusing. Could we just have a new SqueakSource
>>> project called "Xtreams" (small T + an S)? It's not like projects are
>>> expensive to create...
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Nicolas Cellier
>>> <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> So, I started a quick port of VW Xtreams to Squeak this evening.
>>>> Only the Xtreams-Core and the trivial Xtreams-Terminals (no
>>>> file/pipe/socket/pointer).
>>>> You'll find code at http://www.squeaksource.com/XTream.
>>>> My previous experimental Xtream project has been renamed SqueaXTream
>>>> to reduce confusion, but still sits in the same project.
>>>> Please find my report below.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list