[squeak-dev] Re: [Squeak 4.1] Collections: Failure of Concatenation Operator

Göran Krampe goran at krampe.se
Tue Oct 26 17:31:52 UTC 2010


Hi all!

On 10/26/2010 06:41 PM, Peter Kenny wrote:
> as in earlier Squeaks is surely correct. If it is not, maybe we can assume
> that the printString is what is required, but it seems safer to me to fail
> it and force the user to be more explicit.

Having spent last months working in a large Perl system I feel much 
stronger about explicitness being a GOOD thing. More than once did I 
find bugs in the codebase that was due to the fact that Perl tries "too 
damn hard" to be smart.

Sure, some smartness may be fine - but I tend to think these days that 
one should be very careful when trying to guess what the developer wanted.

regards, Göran



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list