Yep. I had it *sort* of working early in Trunk history, but Trunk moved
faster than I could keep up, and I eventually gave up. With the it's core
developers working in Pharo land, the bits had (last time I checked)
accumulated enough Pharoisms that it wasn't clear to me how to keep it
working in Trunk.

FWIW, I think there's a simpler solution to skinning Squeak than Polymorph;
when I was trying to make it work, I noted that it seemed to involve a lot
of overrides that were probably only necessary because it was hard to get
code into Squeak when it was written. I also think it makes sense to attack
that problem after we've integrated some of the simplifications that Juan
put into place in Cuis. Of course, I could be wrong.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz <
glpunzi at lordzealon.com> wrote:

> Polymorph is integrated and developed only for Pharo,and is not more
> compatible with squeak as is.
>
> I'm not sure, but I think is about this.
>
> Lawson English <lenglish5 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> >  On 9/21/10 12:17 PM, Ralph Johnson wrote:
> >> The idea behind Package Universe was that there would be a new one for
> >> each major version of Squeak.   3.10 used the same one for 3.9.  But
> >> as 4.1 diverges from 3.9, we really need to make a new universe for
> >> it.
> >>
> >> -Ralph Johnson
> >>
> >>
> >The upshot is that I can't install PolyMorph at all on Squeak 4.1,
> >whether using the Universe Package browser or the Monticello browser.
> >
> >
> >Lawson
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Casey Ransberger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100921/1844cc00/attachment.htm