[squeak-dev] [OT] Is Cincom slowly killing Visual Smalltalk
siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Sep 22 15:53:51 UTC 2010
On 8 September 2010 13:31, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 08.09.2010, at 12:22, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>> On 9/8/10, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
>>> And I'll go further and say that your fight should NEVER HAVE COME TO
>>> squeak-dev either. This is not an issue regarding the development of
>>> Squeak core or Squeak forks.
>> Unless you are considering porting issues.
>> Let's say creating a Squeak fork for former users of VSE. If the model
>> is separated from the GUI code (no application logic in the GUI
>> classes) it should be doable in reasonable time to move it to a web
>> based solution.
> Which isn't at all what this thread was about. Stop it, please.
Yeah, i wonder, what we as community can do to help improving this situation.
Unless Henrik expected that everyone start saying: 'Boooo to Cincom',
i don't see any constructive movement from our side.
> - Bert -
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev