On 2011/04/08 00:28, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> On 2011/03/31 12:38, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>>> A new version of Tools was added to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Tools-fbs.338.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: Tools-fbs.338
>>> Author: fbs
>>> Time: 31 March 2011, 1:38:40.964 pm
>>> UUID: 373272eb-3606-7746-b992-2194e8ebc1f7
>>> Ancestors: Tools-fbs.337
>>>
>>> Re-add the instvar "growable", accidentally removed in 332 or 333.
>>>
>> If I may be so bold, I'd love some review of this and its related
>> packages:
>>
>> * Tools-fbs.338
>> * ToolsTest-fbs.38
>> * Morphic-fbs.526
>> * Services-Base.47
>> * System-fbs.427
>>
>> Word has it that Eliot promised to integrate RB into the base browser!
>> Evidence!:
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-September/153302.html
>>
>
> Great. I thought it's complete, but you didn't express it explicitly, so
> I wasn't sure. Do you know about dependencies that we should care about
> during integration?

When I load it into a virgin image I follow the order above. I wouldn't 
stake my life on it being entirely 100% correct. There might be some 
interaction between the Morphic and Tools packages, in particular, 
because the Morphic version has changes to how Browsers open.

I have, for instance, noticed that my image "goes away" sometimes when I 
load Morphic. I can hit alt-. and abandon the process, and everything 
Just Works.

frank