On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Hannes Hirzel wrote:

> On 4/14/11, Matthew Fulmer <tapplek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:18:41PM +0200, Bal?zs K?si wrote:
>>> Change ProgressInitiationException's defaultAction to:
>>>
>>> ProgressInitiationException >> defaultAction
>>>
>>> 	UIManager default
>>> 		displayProgress: progressTitle
>>> 		at: aPoint
>>> 		from: minVal
>>> 		to: maxVal
>>> 		during: workBlock
>>>
>>> And move the actual implementations of the displaying to the
>>> corresponding UIManager subclasses.
>>>
>>> The drawback of this approach is that we possibly break code out there
>>> which uses UIManager's displayProgress:at:from:to:during:. So we could
>>> make up a new name like reallyDisplayProgress:at:from:to:during:, and
>>> send that from ProgressInitiationException >> defaultAction. It would
>>> be a bit less nice, but backward compatible. What do you think?
>>
>> There is code in Tweak that calls UIManager directly, but the
>> tweak path never actually involves ProgressInitiationException,
>> so nothing would break here if this were implemented. Looking at
>> how the catchers of ProgressInitializationException work, It
>> looks like that's the best solution
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)
>>
>>
>
>
> Please implement it!

It's done, it just has to be integrated.


Levente

>
> --Hannes
>
>