[squeak-dev] Inbox and Communication

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 08:40:59 UTC 2011


OK, how do we reach consensus on this?

--Hannes

On 4/19/11, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was actually referring to documenting it as _methods_ in
> MCVersionName; not the class-comment (but there's no harm in putting
> it there too).
>
> But before I would do that, I would want to make sure there was
> consensus and then code, tests, inbox, testing, etc..
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Hannes Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 4/19/11, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the great clarification about branches, it makes total
>>> sense.  And, I can understand how a naming-convention would be plenty
>>> good enough for that situation.
>>>
>>> If we do choose to adopt / document this convention, we should capture
>>> it in MCVersionName.  :-)
>>
>> Please do so, for people who did not follow this discussion closely
>> and after a few weeks it willl be forgotten. However looking at the
>> class coment of MCVersionName might not be the most obvious thing to
>> do but still it is a likely place where people will stumble upon....
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list