[squeak-dev] Morphic Performance Graphs
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Fri Apr 29 15:07:54 UTC 2011
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Ben Coman wrote:
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 28.04.2011, at 17:52, Ben Coman wrote:
>
>
> http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/03/morphic-performance/
> http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/03/morphic-flavour-performance/
> http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/04/performance-testing-spreadsheet/
>
>
> Nice work. However, the VM (Interpreter or Cog) is independent of the image (Squeak / Cuis / Pharo). To get comparable results you should run either image on both VMs (or, since you just care about performance, use Cog for all three).
>
> - Bert -
>
>
> Thanks Bert. I only used the All-In-One-Click packages and am not familiar with how mix & match VMs and images. It is not something I have looked
> into yet and a pointer to to some information on that would be useful. Also, Cog seemed to be only newly arrived for Squeak and I didn't want to hit
> complications. I was hoping it was fair to compare Squeak-Plain with Pharo-Plain and them to Pharo-Cog.
>
> To a comment on the morphic-flavour-performance post I have attached a graph of Levente's results for CogVM with recent images.
Thanks. I was too lazy to convert from the output to the format used by
the spreadsheet.
Levente
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|