[squeak-dev] Morphic Performance Graphs

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Fri Apr 29 15:07:54 UTC 2011


On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Ben Coman wrote:

> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>  On 28.04.2011, at 17:52, Ben Coman wrote:
> 
>
>  http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/03/morphic-performance/
> http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/03/morphic-flavour-performance/
> http://blog.openinworld.com/2011/04/performance-testing-spreadsheet/
> 
>
>  Nice work. However, the VM (Interpreter or Cog) is independent of the image (Squeak / Cuis / Pharo). To get comparable results you should run either image on both VMs (or, since you just care about performance, use Cog for all three).
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> 
> Thanks Bert.  I only used the All-In-One-Click packages and am not familiar with how mix & match VMs and images.  It is not something I have looked
> into yet and a pointer to to some information on that would be useful.  Also, Cog seemed to be only newly arrived for Squeak and I didn't want to hit
> complications.  I was hoping it was fair to compare Squeak-Plain with Pharo-Plain and them to Pharo-Cog.
> 
> To a comment on the morphic-flavour-performance post I have attached a graph of Levente's results for CogVM with recent images.

Thanks. I was too lazy to convert from the output to the format used by 
the spreadsheet.


Levente

> 
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list