[squeak-dev] Re: final 4.2 image available
janko.mivsek at eranova.si
Thu Feb 3 23:41:58 UTC 2011
To change the squeak.org website, it is 4.2 out or not? I just saw a
Weekly Squeak article but on the other side I see here a lot of problem
On 03. 02. 2011 20:51, Michael Davies wrote:
> On 2 February 2011 02:19, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu
> <mailto:leves at elte.hu>> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dale Henrichs wrote:
> Looking a little closer, it looks like 4.2 is supposed to use
> the same set of packages as Pharo which implies that the
> repository should be
> 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser' in the
> configuration baseline and not http://source.wiresong.ca/ob. My
> guess is that the packages were in the package-cache when the
> configuration was tested.
> I doubt that would work. Lukas' version of OB has Pharo specific
> code which is not compatible with Squeak.
> Just in case anyone is still having problems getting OB into a 4.2 image...
> I put a pragmatic solution for this into the inbox as Morphic-MAD.512,
> but the problem with the unexpected changes to the postscript and
> pre-amble seem to have derailed its adoption, so for anyone having
> problems with the loading of OmniBrowser, here's a more reliable version
> of that part of the "Extending the system" samples:
> "Omnibrowser including Refactoring engine and OCompletion. Version 1.2"
> Installer ss project: 'MetacelloRepository'; install:
> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: #version:
> with: '1.2') load: #(Dev).
> "Omnibrowser latest release - may include Pharo-specific code!!"
> (Installer ss project: ''MetacelloRepository'') install:
> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform:
> #lastVersion) load: #(Dev).
> I've just tested it with a virgin 4.2 install, and the first snippet
> loads OB fine.
Smalltalk Web Application Server
More information about the Squeak-dev