2011/2/15 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Nicolas Cellier
> <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm just wondering: does a Metaclass have a category ?
>> on one hand, plenty of #category senders are protected with
>> #theNonMetaClass and we could do the same
>> on the other hand, we could just simplify lot of other code with this
>> conveniency...
>
> I don't know about you but I'm forever writing scripts where I want
> metaclass to implement category.  This addition is really useful IMO.
>

I don't, that's why I ask :)
If convenient enough we can generalize it and simplify code further indeed.
It's true that spreading #theNonMetaClass looks more like small-pox
than small-talk.

Nicolas

>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>> 2011/2/15  <commits at source.squeak.org>:
>> > A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
>> > http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-fbs.546.mcz
>> >
>> > ==================== Summary ====================
>> >
>> > Name: Kernel-fbs.546
>> > Author: fbs
>> > Time: 15 February 2011, 4:04:05.286 pm
>> > UUID: 89f8153f-e938-c742-9f8b-002d8e55612c
>> > Ancestors: Kernel-nice.545
>> >
>> > Allow one to declare a new class when one refers to the
>> > as-yet-undeclared class in a class-side method.
>> >
>> > (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7606)
>> >
>> > =============== Diff against Kernel-nice.545 ===============
>> >
>> > Item was added:
>> > + ----- Method: Metaclass>>category (in category 'organization') -----
>> > + category
>> > +       ^ thisClass category!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>